Home
Why the outbreak occured
Tornado Pictures and Damage
Outbreak Statistical Data
Indiana Data
State & County Data
Home Storm Survival Kit
Fujita Scale Enhancement Project
Tornado Myths and Facts
View video footage from WHAS 11 in Louisville, KY from that day
Screen play about the outbreak  by Chris Dalton
Incredible Radio Broadcast as Dick Gilbert tracks an F4 tornado in his helicopter.
The Tornado Videos on Youtube
Fly the paths of the tornadoes using Google Earth courtesy of the University of Michigan.
Tom Wills, Chief Meteorologist at WAVE3 in Louisville, Kentucky Remembers the day.
Tornado and Weather Experiments
My Thank You's
Read first hand eye witness accounts of the super outbreak and even add your own in our Guestbook
Join Our e-mail list and I'll notify you whenever I update the web site!


Send me an E-mail
scott@april31974.com

Newspaper Article on Web Site
Other Tornado Links
NOAA Tornado FAQ
Fujita Scale
Texas Tech Wind Research
Sayler Park Tornado
Noaa-Tornadoes Page
Encarta "Tornado"
Usa Today
Homer Ramby's Xenia, Ohio Site
Kitty Merchant Site
Tornado History Project
Tornado photos!
Storm Chasers Web Site!
Sky Warn 2000
The Tornado Project
NOAA
Ball State Storm Chasers
Weather Channels' Meterologist Kim Perez story on her first hand encounter with a F5 tornado in Sayler Park, Ohio

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Indiana Tornado Data
The following is taken directly from the "Engineering aspects of the Tornadoes of April 3-4, 1974." This section was written and researched by Uwe F. Koehler of Ball State University. Other authors include Kishor Menta, Joseph Minor, James McDonald, Billy Manning, and James Abernathy. Some references to figures are not complete. You may purchase the complete report (this is only 8 pages of 110) at the Texas Tech Web site. The cost is only for photocopying and shipping! You gotta love Texas Tech!!

A series of tornadoes moved northeastward through the State of Indiana during the afternoon of April 3, 1974. Four well defined paths of damage were examined by aerial and ground observers; these damage paths may have been caused by four or more tornadoes, as suggested be the map by Fujita (Figure 1). The four principal paths of damage in Indiana are located on a map of the State in Figure 10; each path is named after areas which sustained major damage:
(1) Monticello path
(2) Kennard path
(3) Hamburg path
(4) DePauw/Madison path
Damage within the State caused by the April 3 storms has been estimated to be as much as $200,000,000. Included in approximately 1000 casualties are 48 confirmed deaths. Table V-I contains a summary of deaths and injuries along these four principal damage paths.
Notable in the Indiana damage survey are (1) damage in Monticello, including destruction of a railroad bridge, (2) damage in the Madison-
Hanover area, (3) the Kennard path, and (4) damage to schools. Particularly thorough photographic documentation of the damage areas in Indiana, and of the Xenia-Cincinnati areas, are on file at Ball State University. More than 3000 photographs (both black and white and color), vertical aerial photographs, and extensive logs, interviews, and newspaper clippings are available.

Table V-1

Summary of Indiana Tornadoes - April 3,1974

Major Damage Path Number Tornado Location Number of Tornadoes Deaths Injuries (hospitalized) Property Damage ($ million)
1. Monticello/ Rochester 3-4 24 432 50+
2. Kennard/ Farmland 3 2 54 10+
3. Hamburg 3 5 40 10+
4. Hanover/ Madison 3-4 17 370 50+
5. Opposite Brandenburg Ky 1 0 0 1
6. Swayzee 2 0 12 5-10
7. N. Manchester 1 0 0 .2


Monticello and Rochester, Indiana
The tornado path through Monticello is illustrated in Figures 11 and 12. The storm crossed an open field as it approached the three schools located on the southwestern edge of the town. From the school complex it moved into a residential area, across an abandoned school, and into the central business district where the county courthouse was severely damaged (Figure 13). It then passed through another residential area to a bluff over the Tippecanoe River. Unusual events took place here: (1) the tornado followed the terrain closely by damaging houses and industrial buildings at the foot of the bluff (approximate elevation difference is 60 ft.) and (2) the winds pushed four spans of a Penn Central Transportation Company railroad bridge off their piers. The spans consisted of two 10 ft. deep plate girders 105 ft. in length carrying a single track. Damaged bridge piers are shown in Figure 14.Click for photo. Structural details of the bridge are available at Texas Tech University. The damage path continues northeastward from Monticello to Rochester where it caused extensive damage to railroad equipment, industrial buildings and residences. Figure 15 illustrates overturned railroad cars and damaged industrial buildings. Figure 16 includes nine houses in Rochester which were destroyed. Note that in five of these eight residences, a small portion of the interior of the residence survived.
The Monticello and Rochester damage documentation is significant because of the variations in types of structures affected, the fact that engineered structures were damaged, and the unusual events associated with the traversing of the relatively narrow river valley on the eastern edge of town. Damage to three of the Monticello schools is discussed in a special section on Indiana schools, below.
Click here for photos of damage to the area.
Madison and Hanover, Indiana
Of significance in the Madison-Hanover area is damage caused by the tornado as it approached the Ohio River on the north bank. The storm affected an electric power plant, a state hospital, residential areas, schools, and Hanover College (Figure 17). Several types of structures were affected—a damaged nursing home is shown in Figures 18 and 19, a damaged apartment house is shown in Figure 20, damage to Hanover College is illustrated in Figure 21, and damage to residences in Hanover is shown in Figure 22. Click here for photos of damage to the area.

 

 

 

Kennard Damage Path
The damage path through Grant City and Kennard is illustrated in Figure 23. Damage to a funeral home in Parker/Farmland area is shown in Figure 24. mobile home damage in this area is illustrated in Figure 25. Damage along this path was to rural housing and buildings.
School Damage
An important, and sometimes highly emotional, problem which faces the designers and owners of schools concerns the providing of protection for school children from the effects of tornadoes. The Indiana Department of Public Instruction compiled data on 24 schools which sustained storm induced damage; a summary of this agency’s report is contained in Table V-2. No school related deaths were reported in Indiana schools, or in schools that were affected by the storm in Ohio, Kentucky, and Alabama, principally because of the late afternoon and evening times of tornado occurrences. Nonetheless, the realization of the disaster which may have occurred has brought forth expressions of concern from school officials and recommendations for additional attention to occupant protection from architects and engineers. Several specific school damage incidents are presented in the following subparagraphs to emphasize the nature of the problem and to summarize the data that are available.
 

Table V-2

School Damage Report

County School and Corporation Damage Estimate
Harrison North Harrison Schools
Morgan Twp. Elementary (1-5)
Enrollment - (258)
Roof Deck Damage
Estimated Loss -$20,000
Jefferson Madison Consolidated Schools
E. O. Muncie Elem School (k-6)
 Enrollment - (779)
Roof/windows
Estimated Loss - $500,00 Covered by insurance
  Michigan Road Elementary School (K-6)
Enrollment (239)
click for photo
Estimated Loss $500,00 Future Uncertain Covered by Insurance
  Southwestern Jefferson Schools
Southwestern High School (9-12)
Enrollment - (464)
Click for photo
Estimated Loss - $300,000
Gymnasium $100,00
Repairable
  Southwestern El- Jr (K-8) 
Enrollment - (1266)
Click for Photo
Estimated loss $1,500,000
Will be rebuilt
Decatur Decatur Co. Comm. Schools South Decatur High School (7-12) Enrollment - (739) 60% of gym roof damaged
Water Damage to gym Floor
Water Damage to Lobby
Water Damage to the music area
Cafeteria wall caved in
Estimated loss  - $100,00
Henry Charles A. Beard Schools
Kennard Elementary School (K-6) - Enrollment (176)
Total Loss
Estimated loss -$720,000
Insurance Covers 90% of the cost
  Blue River Valley School Corp.
Blue River Valley High School (7-12) Enrollment - (582)
Roof Damage, glass Damage, And Water Damage
Estimated cost < $20,000
Fully Covered by Insurance
Randolph Monroe Central School Corp.
Monroe Central H.S. (7-12)
Enrollment - (565)
Estimated loss - $1,900,000
Insurance available $ 1,500,00
Some equipment salvageable
Kosciusko Warsaw Community Schools
Attwood Elem. School (K-6)
Enrollment - (179)
Roof/windows
Estimated loss - $11,000
  Leesburg Elem School (K-6)
 Enrollment (410)
Roof on gym and top of School
estimated loss - $14,000
Miami-Grant Oak Hill United School Corp.
Sqayzee Elem School (K-6)
Enrollment - (393)
Gym roof Damage
Estimated loss - $30,000
Fulton Rochester Community Schools
Riddle Elementary (K-5)
Enrollment (559)
60-65% of Building Damaged.
Roof, wall and 3/4 glass
Estimated loss -$300,000
Kosciusko - Fulton Tippecanoe Valley School Corp.
Talma Middle School (6-8)
 Enrollment - (279)
Total Loss - no estimate
Adams North Adams Comm. Schools
Bellmont High School (9-12)
Enrollment - (1082)
Auditorium roof moved -- with water damage. Roof on High School damaged; also, window and water damage.
Estimated loss - $50,000
  Bellmont Jr High School (5-8)
Enrollment - (422)
Steeple of church next door fell through roof and floor
Estimated loss - $100,00
Washington East Washington school Corp.
Eastern High School (7-12)
Enrollment (572)
Nominal Roof Damage
Estimate Unavailable
  Polk Elementary School (1-6)
 Enrollment (146)
Roof Damage
Estimated Loss - $5,000
Noble West Noble School Corp.
Perry Central Elementary (K-6)
Enrollment (404)
Roof of Auditorium blown off.
Gym cannot be rebuilt, classroom damage
Estimated loss $1,000,000+
Hancock Eastern Hancock School Corp.
Wilkinson Elementary School (1-6) Enrollment - (350)
Gym Roof Damage
Estimated loss - $10,000
  Charlottesville Elementary School Estimated Loss - $3,000
White Twin Lakes School Corp
Twin Lakes High School (10-12)
Enrollment (669) Click for photo
Total Loss
Estimated Loss $3,300,000
  Roosevelt Jr. High School (7-9)
Enrollment (713) Click for Photo
Building can be utilized with repairs
Estimated loss $1,900,000
  Meadowlawn Elementary School (K-6) Enrollment -(508) Click for Photo Total Loss
Will be rebuilt
Estimated Loss $1,000,000
Total Students involved. All schools reporting 11,754
Total estimated Cost. All Schools Reporting $13,283,000+
Total students moved and/or changed facilities 6,000
Number of School Corporations reporting damage 25
Number of Counties Reporting Damage 16


Meadowlawn, Twin Lakes, and Roosevelt Schools, Monticello
Three schools on the southwestern edge of Monticello experienced the effects of a tornado that passed across the town late in the afternoon 0f ~~~
April 3. Meadowlawn Elementary School caught the full effects of the tornado. Twin Lakes High School felt severe, but not direct, effects next. Roosevelt Junior High School was located on the left edge of the advancing tornado and was less severely damaged.

The Meadowlawn school should provide investigators with a classic tornado-structure interaction event for study. This school has a principal main hallway oriented east-west, with classrooms on either side. The tornado slammed directly into the school from across an open field. Classrooms on the south side of the hallway were extensively damaged -- window walls demolished and open web steel roof joists and roof were uplifted. Classrooms on the north s1de of the hallway were virtually undamaged. The principal hallway was undamaged except for the west glass doors which were broken. The hallway would have been a safe haven for school children.

The Twin Lakes High School is oriented such that the southwestern-most corner of the complex is a gymnasium (Ref. Figures 12 and 26). This corner of the complex is approximately 1000 ft. north and east of the Meadowlawn school. Damage to the Twin Lakes school was concentrated in the gymnasium area (the gym proper and adjacent one-story dressing rooms) and in classrooms on the west side of the complex. Un-reinforced, non-load bearing masonry walls (12 in. concrete block with brick facing), which formed the south and west external walls of the gymnasium (extending from the roof of the first floor dressing rooms to the roof level of the gym) - toppled outward. Although atmospheric pressure change inducing outward acting pressures may have been a factor in these wall failures, there is evidence of lateral movement of the gymnasium structural frame (steel trusses on beams which frame to pipe columns; column height approximately 30 ft.) within the masonry I shell .I. The evidence (vertically cracked interior masonry walls at the locations of pipe columns) suggests that wind ... loads induced a lateral translation of the structural frame to the north-east and, upon rebounding, the frame pushed the south and west un-reinforced masonry walls outward.

A significant missile incident at the Twin Lakes school involves a steel wide-flange beam which formed the roof support along the western edge of a second story classroom (Ref. Figure 26). This beam was lifted over the school building as the second story roof failed upward, and fell on the opposite (east) side of the building in the school yard. (Near white automobile on east side of school, Figure 26). Additional study of this incident using data available at PASC-Detroit is indicated.

As in the Meadowlawn school, hallways would have proved to be safe havens for school children in the Twin Lakes school. The school tornado plan called for building occupants to move to first floor hallways away from outside doors; this plan would have assured protection of building occupants, if warning times would have permitted planned movements of people.


The Roosevelt Junior High School. located to the north and west of the Twin Lakes school sustained less damage than the other two Monticello schools. The significant documentation item from this school is a barograph recording taken on a lower floor in the north central portion of the building. The barograph trace is reproduced in part in Figure 27.

Monroe Central School (Kennard Damage Path. Parker/Farmland)
The Monroe Central School was extensively damaged, but examination of the structure reveals that the principal failure mechanism was related to load bearing masonry walls. Figure 28 illustrates damage to the gymnasium area (near wing) and to classrooms (far wings). Load bearing masonry walls at the ends of the gymnasium failed (Ref. Figure 29). Although this failure compromised the structural integrity of the building the structural frame remained intact (Ref. Figure 30). Failures of masonry walls and failures of precast concrete roof units are also evident. Interior hallways away from areas with roofs supported on exterior walls and away from entrances would have been safe havens in this school.

Kennard, Elementary School
An old three-story elementary school at Kennard was heavily damaged (Ref. Figure 31). Although occupied by more than 100 persons at the time the tornado struck, no one was injured. Failures of load bearing masonry walls provided the basic collapse mechanism (Ref. Figure 32). First floor interior hallways were havens of refuge in this structure.


Recommended Additional Work in Indiana
Extensive data assembled at Ball State University and data which can be assembled from other sources could be used to significantly advance understandings of the impact of tornadoes on structures and people. The following activities should be undertaken using Indiana events and data to add to the general knowledge of tornadoes and extreme winds and their effects:

(1) An extensive investigation of “Wind-Structure-Occupant Interaction” in slab on grade residences should be undertaken (1) to identify inherent tornado shelters. (2) to make design improvements to increase safety, and (3) to explore operational aspects of warning techniques. The ultimate goal of the study is a possible publication—with easily understandable recommendations for home owners, designers, and civil defense planners.

(2) In view of the extensive damage to the Monticello central business district, development of alternative urban design concepts for Monticello as well as conceptual studies for selected architectural projects could be undertaken.

(3) Various building types should be studied to determine characteristic modes of failure and to attempt a measurement of the risk of survival at recommended places of refuge within buildings. The main purpose of the study would be to examine the scope of alternatives available to the design profession.

(4) An effort is warranted to continue the data bank compilation, Ito analyze structural damage (aided by a series of aerial photo reconnaissance maps taken April 6 and 16), and to make a
detailed personal injury survey. The latter task will be particularly valuable. There is a dearth of data that specifically relates personal injury to precise details of structural damage in tornado disasters—the indicated work to significantly add to the literature in this regard.

(5) Specific studies of Indiana schools—accomplished in conjunction with similar studies of schools in Ohio, Kentucky, and Alabama—should provide a very complete picture of the responses of various types of structural systems to the effects of extreme winds. Furthermore, such studies should provide valuable information for school officials on (1) where school children
should be located in existing schools when tornadoes threaten and (2) how to design tornado protection into new schools.

(6) Studies of the unusual events associated with the crossing of the lake in Monticello by the terrain following tornado—including studies of the damaged railroad bridge—should be I undertaken.